• Home
      • Back
      • Search our website
      • The Isabella Dalgarno Story
  • About Us
      • Back
      • Contact Dalgarno Institute
      • The Mission
      • The Niche
      • Become a Member Today
      • Donate Now
      • Heritage 100 Club
  • Advocacy
      • Back
      • Isabella's List
      • Dalgarno AOD Policy
      • People Against Drink/Drug Driving
      • Fence Builder
      • Monitoring Alcohol
      • Injecting Rooms
      • Back
      • Isabella's List Updates
      • Isabella's List Awards
      • Partner Resources
      • To Your Health
      • Become a member today
      • Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
  • Resources
      • Back
      • The Conundrum Continues Blog
      • Cannabis Conundrum
      • Research Reports
      • Research you can use
      • Drug Information Sheets
      • Partner Resources
      • Naltrexone
      • Radio Spots
      • Back
      • Cannabis & Your Community
      • Cannabis as Medicine?
      • Cannabis Resource Library
      • Media Releases
      • D.A.R.T. Think Tank
      • Need Counselling
      • Dalgarno Video Blog
  • Education
      • Back
      • NoBrainer - Curriculum
          • Back
          • Curriculum
          • I Wish I Never DVD Curriculum
          • Party Girl DVD Curriculum
          • Humpty Dumpty Resiliency Education
      • Parent Program
      • World Resiliency Week
      • AOD Educators
          • Back
          • Not even once!
          • Tony Hoang
          • Drug Free Lifestyle
          • D.E.A.S.Y AOD Ed
          • Save Your Brain - DFA
          • Teen Drug Use is Not Inevitable
          • Interactive Incursions
      • First Peoples
      • Unnecessary Harm Podcast
  • Give NoBrainer

High-THC Cannabis Concentrates and Their (Scary) Effect on the Teenage Brain

Details
17 August 2021
766

Denver Health’s substance treatment program sees roughly 500 youths each year for substance abuse, and Thurstone says 95 percent of the referrals he gets are for marijuana, which, despite popular opinion, has been proven to be addictive. Concentrates, with their higher THC levels, may be even more so. But it’s not just the standard trappings of dependence that are worrisome to health care professionals; it’s also that they’re observing a correlation between cannabis concentrates and mental health issues, such as depression, suicidal ideation, psychosis, and schizophrenia, as well as disturbing physical conditions such as cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome, characterized by severe vomiting.

It is, of course, illegal in Colorado for anyone under 21 without a red card to purchase or use cannabis. The reality is that according to data from the state’s 2019 Healthy Kids Colorado Survey, 20.6 percent of Centennial State high schoolers and 5.2 percent of middle schoolers say they have used marijuana in the past 30 days. Those numbers haven’t changed much over the years, but one critical statistic has: The same survey found that between 2015 and 2019, the percentage of high schoolers who had recently dabbed (translation: inhaled concentrated doses of vaporized cannabis) went from 5.7 percent to 10.2 percent.

“The scary thing about this,” says Dr. Christian Hopfer, an addiction psychiatrist at UCHealth’s Center for Dependency, Addiction, and Rehabilitation (CeDAR), “is that this is a relatively recent phenomenon. We don’t know much about how extremely high doses of THC affect people, children or adults. We’re seeing greater risks of psychotic disorders and serious effects to cognition in our kids, but we have no real understanding of what these concentrates do to the developing brain.” That is why so many different stakeholders—doctors, researchers, legislators, psychologists, school districts, advocacy groups, and parents—have been throwing up flares. Their question: Are you sure your kids aren’t dabbing?

Marijuana might be the most synonymized noun in the world, but dabbing has a language all its own. Trust us, your kids know the lingo; you should, too.

Concentrates: Broadly refers to any cannabis product that has been made through a process where extraneous plant matter is mostly removed, leaving behind only aromatic oils called terpenes and cannabinoids, like cannabidiol (CBD) and THC

Dabbing: The method of flash-vaporizing cannabis concentrates—typically extracted oils of varying consistencies—on a hot surface and inhaling them to get high

Dab rig: Also called an oil rig, this is a water pipe—essentially, a sophisticated glass bong—that has attachments specifically designed for dabs of marijuana concentrate

Dabber: Sometimes called a wand, this is a small tool used to pick up a dab of concentrate and place it on the heated surface of a dab rig

Vape pens: Much like e-cigarettes, these are portable, pen-shaped vaporizers that are typically refillable with cartridges of concentrates

Dabs: A catch-all word for any concentrate or extract that can be flash-vaporized and inhaled

E-nail: A dabbing device that electronically heats the nail

Extracts: A specific type of concentrate made using solvents, like alcohol, butane, propane, or CO2; all extracts are concentrates, but not all concentrates are extracts

Hash: A pressed cannabis concentrate—made without using solvents—of the plant’s sticky glands that is commonly smoked and vaped but can also be dabbed

Nail: The metal, glass, or ceramic spike attached to a water pipe; dabs are applied to the nail once it has been heated up electronically or with a torch

Torch: A handheld butane or propane torch often used to heat the nail of a dab rig; a jet lighter also works

 

Types of Cannabis Concentrates

Concentrates and extracts don’t look like bud, get packaged like bud, or smell quite like bud, making them somewhat easier to conceal. Here, a not-at-all-comprehensive inventory of products that could be hiding in your teenager’s nightstand.

Graphical user interfaceDescription automatically generated

Photo by Matthew Stacey. Photo illustration by Sean Parsons

Shatter: An amber-colored extract that has a transparent, stiff, glasslike quality and breaks easily
Typically used with: a dab rig

Sugar: An extract that comes in a wide range of colors—very light yellow to almost amber—and has the consistency of wet, sappy sugar
Typically used with: a dab rig

Budder: A dark yellow extract that has a creamy, butterlike texture
Typically used with: a dab rig

Live Rosin: A high-quality solventless extract, usually pale yellow to golden in color with a gooey, honeylike consistency
Typically used with: a dab rig, a glass bowl, a joint, or a concentrates vape pen

Crumble: An extract that can be yellow, orange, or light brown and that has a soft, crumbly texture
Typically used with: a dab rig or sprinkled over flower in joints, pipes, and bongs

Wax: An extract that has a soft, waxy consistency
Typically used with: a dab rig or a concentrates vape pen

Distillate: A potent cannabis oil extract that has been stripped of all materials and compounds except for certain cannabinoids, like THC or CBD
Typically used with: a concentrates vape pen (with refillable cartridges)

Tell-Tale Signs That Your Kids Might Be Using Concentrates

Just because you think your teenagers don’t have the wherewithal to buy concentrates—much less a dab rig—doesn’t mean they can’t improvise ways to do both. If you’ve been finding soda cans or water bottles cut in half; if you’re missing butter knives from your drawers; if you’ve found unwound paperclips; if you can’t find your crème brûlée torch…your 15-year-old might be more resourceful than you realize. All of these items can be used to fashion a homemade dab rig. “You need to be paying attention to these things,” says Denver Health’s Dr. Christian Thurstone. “It’s reasonable that if you see something funny that you trust your gut and investigate.” What else should you be looking for? Lighters, small glass or silicone jars, and parchment sheets can be clues your kid is using. Money or sellable items that go missing are other hints. “A lot of parents struggle with parenting teens, especially when it comes to privacy,” says CeDAR’s Dr. Christian Hopfer. “If you’re concerned, privacy should not be respected, especially if there are mental health concerns. Parents are often unwilling to play cop—and that can have tragic consequences.”

Your (Kid’s) Brain On THC

The human brain isn’t fully developed until roughly age 25. When THC is introduced to that still-evolving organ, it impacts how neural connections are made. As one Colorado doctor put it, “the brain only gets one shot at growing up,” and THC can stunt that growth in ways we already know—and likely in many others that we don’t. (See also ALL Young Cannabis Users Face Psychosis and  Cannabis & Suicide – Causal & Correlate?

Here' what (some of) the available science says about young people and cannabis.

Because the federal government classifies cannabis as a Schedule I drug, studying marijuana in the United States is a difficult—and frustrating—endeavor. Universities that rely on federal funding are loath to risk losing that cash to research marijuana on campus. Furthermore, any institution that does want to study cannabis must go through the feds to procure product; however, the cannabis grown at federally designated facilities rarely has THC concentrations higher than five or 10 percent. “There is a large body of research about what lower THC concentrations do and don’t impact,” says Dr. Sam Wang, a pediatric emergency medicine doctor at Children’s Hospital Colorado who is also board certified in medical toxicology. “But there is a paucity of literature about the impacts of high-THC doses on health.” Still, many health professionals say the results from the research that does exist with regard to addiction as well as high concentrations of THC are disturbing enough to merit red-flag warnings for youngsters. Local experts pointed us to several studies for a bit of light reading.

In March 2021, JAMA Pediatrics published the results of an addiction study executed by National Institute on Drug Abuse scientists. The research examined the proportion of adolescents and young adults who had developed substance use disorders (SUDs) in the previous year at various intervals since they first used certain drugs, including cannabis. The findings? Marijuana users between 12 and 17 had nearly double the prevalence (10.7 percent) of SUDs one year after first using cannabis compared with adolescents who first used alcohol (5.6 percent) or nicotine (6.6 percent). After three years, the addiction rate for cannabis among adolescents was 20.1 percent; it was 10.9 percent for those ages 18 to 25. The data, says the National Institutes of Health, emphasize the vulnerability of young teenagers to developing SUDs.

A mostly Europe-based study that aimed to identify patterns of cannabis use with the strongest effect on developing psychotic disorders received a lot of attention when it was published in the Lancet in March 2019. The conclusions were disturbing. Daily cannabis use was associated with higher likelihoods of psychotic disorders compared with people who had never used marijuana, but those numbers rose to nearly five times increased odds for daily use of high-THC types of cannabis. Another disconcerting finding: Those who had started using high-concentration cannabis by age 15 showed a doubling of risk of psychotic disorders compared with those who had never used.

Researchers in the United Kingdom published a study about the impacts of high-THC cannabis in JAMA Psychiatry in May 2020. The question they posed: Does high-THC cannabis increase risks for problems resulting from cannabis use, common mental disorders, and psychotic experiences, after controlling for early-life mental health symptoms and frequency of use? The short answer is yes. Of the 1,087 participants who reported cannabis use in the previous year, use of high-THC cannabis was associated with a significant increase in the frequency of cannabis use, likelihood of cannabis-related problems, and rates of anxiety disorder.

Are there fallacies about pot’s addictive qualities?
Marijuana is often downplayed for its addictive qualities when compared to other substances of abuse. I often hear from my clients, “I was just smoking pot.” THC activates the reward circuitry of our brains in ways that may cause this circuitry to be hijacked. While the effects of marijuana may wear off after just a couple of hours, the half-life of THC is quite long. The half-life of THC for mild users is between one and two days, but THC can still be traced in the system of a mild user for weeks afterward. For those who use cannabis frequently or use higher concentrations of THC, the half-life is between one and two weeks and THC lasts within their systems for much, much longer. This accrual of THC leads to increasing tolerance and the belief that there isn’t much to the withdrawal from cannabis. The higher the THC, the higher the addictive potential. Once the body becomes acclimated to the presence of THC, withdrawal symptoms kick in.

Withdrawal isn’t the only thing we need to worry about with frequent THC use, right?
Moderate to severe cannabis use is associated with reductions in two measures of intelligence and cognitive ability: working memory and processing speed. More research is needed to definitively state whether these reductions are permanent or temporary in adolescents or young adults. For adolescents who use cannabis, however, there are studies that show that these reductions are permanent and don’t recover in adulthood, even if they stop using.

This Wasn’t In The Parenting Manual
“The first time my son got suspended from school, I remember his coach said to me, ‘Don’t be too hard on him; it’s just pot.’ He said that because my son was an athlete and a good kid. He was just 14. But within two months, my son exited his life. He became a different human being. His joie de vivre was impacted. One day I got in a fight with him about not showing up to school, and I said, ‘I think this is the pot. You have to stop.’ He said, ‘If I have to stop smoking pot, I’m going to kill myself. In fact, I’m going to kill myself right now.’ He went to his room and locked the door. I called the police for help, and it was a cop who told me I needed to be very concerned about his marijuana use. He said, ‘It’s not like what you smoked when you were younger.’ That’s how I learned about dabbing. My son was a fun, sweet, supersensitive kid. Then he wanted to be in his room all the time. He was buying shatter and wax through a senior with a medical card. They did it over Snapchat. One night after he came home from work—he got a job at 15—he was looking for something in the backyard shed. He was crying. He told me he used to have fun before drugs, but now he only had fun when he was doing drugs… But then he developed cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome; he was just vomiting all the time. I took him to the ER 11 times in nine months. Eventually we found a doctor who said, ‘This is the pot.’ He looked at her and said, ‘This is medicine!’ He stopped because of the hyperemesis, but his executive functioning has been impacted and there are cognitive issues. I wonder why an 18-year-old can get a medical card and buy two ounces a day but can’t buy tobacco or a Coors Light.”

For more Reality Check Stories and complete article

World Drug Day 2021: Get the Facts for Your Healthy Life and Community

Details
22 June 2021
702

View PDF

Connected Caring Community Counts:  New Study – Social Capital Matters for Alcohol Prevention.  

Details
18 May 2021
698

May 2021 

A new study published in the journal Health & Place in March, 2021 explored how neighborhood and social network characteristics are related to adult binge alcohol use. They found that higher social cohesiveness reduces the likelihood of binge alcohol use. In unsafe, disorderly neighborhoods with low cohesion more interconnected social networks led to lower binge alcohol use.

A new study published in the journal Health & Place in March, 2021 explored how neighborhood and social network characteristics are related to adult binge alcohol use.

The study utilized online surveys from adults ages 30 to 80 years, drawn randomly from the RAND American Life Panel. Key findings are as follows:

  • Living in a highly cohesive neighborhood reduces the likelihood of binge alcohol use;
  • In safe and orderly neighborhoods, people with more interconnected social networks are more likely to consume alcohol “socially” and consume heavily in these occasions, regardless of cohesiveness.
  • However, neighborhood and network factors control how often a person might binge on alcohol. This is possibly through neighbors checking up on each other.
  • In disordered, unsafe communities that are lacking cohesion, neighborhood factors lose their overall impact. In such neighborhoods people with more interconnected social networks are less likely to engage in binge alcohol use.

 

For more

Youth drinking declines: What have we learned? (NDARC-2021)

Details
16 April 2021
878

youthdrinkingYouth drinking declines: What have we learned? (NDARC-2021)

Some Take Aways from this Overview

Review of surveys and data sets analysed between 2001-2018 revealed,

  • Average @ 60% decrease in numbers of teens underage drinking
  • Average @ 35% decrease in young adult drinking 18-29 y.o. demographic
  • Significant increase in teenagers not drinking at all by approximated 50%
  • Teens drinking at risky levels also reduced by about 50%

Why these shifts?

Some contributing factors are (none are silver bullets and all mostly small, not significant influencer)

  1. Young people attitudes shift in concerns that alcohol causes most deaths and harms in their community and demographic (again consistent public health messaging taking effect)
  2. Smaller generation gap issue. Changing family dynamics, warmer parenting with more quality and quantity time, which consequently facilitates greater supervision and expectation about teen activity and where abouts. Better modelling by parents around alcohol use, including frequency and intensity changes. (Icelandic model reflects much of this)
  3. Shifting attitudes to alcohol and teen reactions against previous heavy drinking cohorts.
  4. Increasing focus on health and fitness – young people want to focus on study and success and see drinking as taking away from ability to do that…Once into young adult hood, can ‘let hair down’ a bit more. Alcohol increasingly more associated with poor health and health outcomes both short and long term.  Short term diminished capacity for study due being sick is increasingly seen as a liability. Again, growing community awareness of these realities e.g. cancer, mental health etc, may also drive this attitude.
  5. Changing patterns in leisure – Online based activities may mean a significant reduction in the peer proximity contagion e.g. not congregating with friends in public or private spaces and engaging in boredom and peer pressure initiated drinking. Online
  6. Policy changes – Policy didn’t seem to drive change, more reflect it, but the combination of both attitude and legislation brings weight to bear in culture shift, e.g secondary supply laws, alcohol pop tax etc. Cultural position of alcohol is shifting. Not so much the central amenity
  7. Other – Shift to other substances? This research seems to think this is not so, as a other risky behaviours seem to follow the same trajectory – Authenticity in being and relating. Teens are communicating they find non-drinking peers more ‘real and supportive’ and easier to forge genuine intimacies with. Surveillance – the advent of ‘instant recording and sharing’ via social media technologies, this both adds to the volume and frequency of ‘live’ negative harms/consequences of alcohol use, but also vulnerabilities to exposure to ridicule, blackmail or sabotaging future opportunities.

Dalgarno Institute: Further Reflections

Culture shift on any level requires multiple factors and as we have argued continuously for decades, education and legislation work far more effectively to shift both societal attitudes and culture, than simply education alone.

Consistency in both messaging, practice and modelling in an all-of-society context is also vital for culture shift to occur. The avoidance of contradictions or confusion in messages and models, as well as in policies and practices is imperative if we are to avoid the undermining of protective and preventative measures for the emerging generation – our children.  Any contradictions of messaging and modelling in the public square only creates the cognitive dissonance and inertia in proactive best proactive public health change that the broader society is mandated to bring to the young – The future generations that it is charged for providing the best opportunity to grow strong, healthy and productively in every area of development.   

This must include…

  • Resilience building into the emerging generation.
  • Understanding resiliency development holistically without Alcohol or Other Drugs
  • Community/Society wide protective and prevention focused strategies and models
  • Removal of all elements that create confusion and/or contradiction to best practice.
  • Adherence in United Nations Rights for the Child, by all Public Sectors and their policy formation
  • Though this review of literature did not specifically look at Minimum Drinking or purchasing ages, indications are that such changes may assist in delay of uptake even further.

Child Alcohol Sipping and Alcohol Expectancies  

Details
12 April 2021
1643

This study found that 22% of the children in the sample had sipped alcohol. Beer was the most frequently sipped and the beverage originally belonged to the father.

The study concludes that, providing sips of alcohol to children is associated with them having more favorable expectations about alcohol use.

RELEASE DATE: 01/04/2021

The Association Between Child Alcohol Sipping and Alcohol Expectancies in the ABCD Study

Abstract – Background: Underage alcohol use is a serious societal concern, yet relatively little is known about child sipping of alcohol and its relation to beliefs about alcohol. The current study aimed to (1) examine the contexts in which the first sip of alcohol occurs (e.g., type of alcohol, who provided sip, sip offered or taken without permission); (2) examine the association between sipping and alcohol expectancies; and (3) explore how different contexts of sipping are related to alcohol expectancies. This study expected to find that children who had sipped alcohol would have increased positive expectancies and reduced negative expectancies compared to children who had never sipped alcohol.

Methods: Data were derived from the 2.0 release of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, a longitudinal study of children in the United States. The present study utilized data from 4,842 children ages 9–11; 52% were male, 60% were White, 19% were Hispanic/Latinx, and 9% were Black/African American.

Results: This study found that 22% of the sample had sipped alcohol. Children reported sipping beer most frequently, and the alcoholic beverage most often belonged to the child’s father. It was found that children who had sipped had higher positive alcohol expectancies than children who had not while accounting for variables related to alcohol expectancies. Child sipping was not significantly associated with negative expectancies and the context of the first sip of alcohol was not significantly associated with positive and negative expectancies.

Conclusions: Providing sips of alcohol to children is associated with them having more favorable expectations about alcohol use.

 For complete research

Page 20 of 31

  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24

unodc

unodc

g burg

Prevention Priority Track - 8th World Forum and 27th ECAD's Mayors' Conference

 

 

lead

 

Primary Prevention & Demand Reduction Overview

Federal Committee Inquiry Public Communications Targeting Drug Abuse – Report

Dalgarno Institute Submission to Committee

Bounce Back Resiliency Seminar

podcast sml

Parenting in the Humpty Dumpty Dilemma 

 Pathways2PreventionDFAF 275

 

children

 

children

areyouaware

gov

Scoring The Pill Test

Ecstasy Deaths – Red Card on Pill Testing

Pill Testing Interview

Download One

Download Two

Download Three

Download Four

Download Five

Download Six

Document Seven

Score the Test Here

Pill Testing Deception

Other Info Sheets

VAPING CRISIS Info Sheet

Cannabis Conundrum Info Sheet

The Genotoxic Portfolio of Cannabis

E-Cigarette Health Outcomes Info-graph

What You Need to Know to Talk to Your Kids About VAPING

Check out the video clips on our YouTube Channel
YouTube Dalgarno 200

Parent Information Network

pinlogo

About Us

The Dalgarno Institute was named after a woman who was a key figure in the early reformation movements of the mid 19th Century. Isabella Dalgarno personified the spirit of a large and growing movement of socially responsible people who had a heart for both social justice and social responsibility....

read more

Get in Touch

PO Box 7005, Dandenong, Vic, 3175
1300 975 002
Contact Us
Online Store
© Dalgarno Institute.
Website and Hosting by PresData Services.
office use only

Search

Search
- All words: Returns only documents that match all words.
- Any word: Returns documents that match any word.
- Exact Phrase: Returns only documents that match the exact phrase entered.
- Phrase Prefix: Works like the Exact Phrase mode, except that it allows for prefix matches on the last term in the text.
- Wildcard: Returns documents that match a wildcard expression.
- Fuzzy query: Returns documents that contain terms similar to the search term. For example: If you search for Kolumbia. It will return search results that contain Columbia or Colombia.
Geek ElasticSearch powered by JoomlaGeek.com

Sign Up to Our Newsletter

Signup to the FenceBuilder Newsletter