Imagine if you had to tell a family that their child was never coming home again...because a driver had a few too many drinks and they were too lazy to get a taxi? How would you feel if it was your child? Your brother, your parent, your best friend? Now imagine that you're the one who had a few drinks and thought...Home isn't too far. I'll make it without getting busted. While on the back streets worrying if the booze bus will catch you, you hit someone. How do you live with that for the rest of your life?
The Supreme Court is considering a case involving truck driver Douglas Horn, who was terminated after a drug test revealed THC in his system, despite using a product he believed to be THC-free. Horn has taken legal action against the product’s manufacturer, Medical Marijuana Inc., under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), arguing that he suffered a business injury. During oral arguments, several justices appeared inclined to allow Horn to proceed with his claim, focusing on whether he meets the RICO requirement of being injured in business or property. The outcome could redefine how consumers seek redress against misleading product claims, particularly in the burgeoning cannabis industry.
Horn’s case originated when he began using a “wellness product” named Dixie X, advertised as containing zero THC. After failing a mandatory drug test, Horn independently verified the product did contain THC, leading to his dismissal. The court’s decision could send the case back to lower courts for further proceedings, potentially setting a precedent for similar disputes involving cannabis-related products. For additional details, visit New York Times.
